231-922-9460 | Google +

Showing posts with label universities. Show all posts
Showing posts with label universities. Show all posts

Friday, November 2, 2012

For-Profit Colleges in Financial Trouble

story first appeared in The Wall Street Journal

As consumers wise up about education spending, for-profit colleges are getting schooled.

Institutions such as Apollo Group Inc.'s University of Phoenix, DeVry Inc. and Washington Post Co.'s Kaplan—who only a few years ago reported double-digit student gains on a regular basis and posted hundreds of millions in profits—now are hemorrhaging students.

The storm was supposed to have passed for for-profit colleges when proposed regulations restricting access to federal student aid were watered down, and then overturned earlier this year. But some schools are still hurting, and it looks like the pain won't let up any time soon. Successful schools are often invested in new technology fields, offering concentrations in things like Wind Turbine Repair and Solar Panel maintenance.

They are facing increased competition from nonprofit and state schools and growing skepticism about the value of a high-cost education. Just last week, industry bellwether Apollo said it would close nearly half of its brick-and-mortar locations to save on overhead.

It wasn't supposed to be this way. After years of government scrutiny and bad press about recruiting practices and questionable academic quality, schools worked to improve their reputations by tightening admissions standards, beefing up student support services and pouring money into rebranding. They received a slight reprieve this summer when a federal judge struck down a series of regulations that could have restricted schools' access to the federal student aid that supplies most of their revenue.

But the hoped-for recovery has failed to materialize as students rethink college entirely, and nonprofit schools muscle in to compete for market share.

Now, some analysts say pockets of the industry may never recover, with school closures and further losses all but certain.

Under the old model, schools boosted enrollment by getting students—generally working adults seeking a quick career jump-start—in the door, often with little regard for whether they eventually earned a degree.
Kevin Kinser, an associate professor of higher education policy at the State University of New York at Albany said that colleges could be very profitable as a business, even if not as an educational institution.

No longer. Apollo said last week that enrollment fell by nearly 14% to 328,400 in the fiscal quarter ended Aug. 31. Student counts have dropped by nearly a third since their May 2010 peak of 476,500. The school says the money saved from closing classrooms will be rededicated to its online programs.The school blames its dwindling enrollment in part on increased competition from more traditional education providers, as well as the fact that many potential students don't move beyond University of Phoenix's free "orientation," a trial period of instruction before tuition is due, spokesman Mark Brenner says.

The economy has also put pressure on schools, which normally benefit from economic downturns as adults seek to bolster their résumés with new skills and degrees. This time around, the weak job market coupled with rising college costs has made many prospective students leery of investing in school without guaranteed returns.

The U.S. Department of Education recently reported the first drop in college enrollment in more than a decade—albeit one of less than 0.2%—based on data for students enrolled in fall 2011. But for-profit colleges saw enrollment fall by 2.8%.

Meanwhile, as states seek to reduce government spending, legislators see financial aid that ends up at for-profit schools as an easy target for cuts. In California, lawmakers this summer decreed that students at 154 schools—nearly all of them for-profit colleges—will no longer be eligible for the state's need-based Cal Grants, citing the schools' low graduation rates and students' heavy debt burdens.

To boost graduation rates and keep student-loan defaults in check, Apollo and peers are now competing for higher-quality students who have a better shot of graduating. But nonprofit schools are successfully courting the same market segment, with more students turning to online degree programs at schools including University of Maryland University College, Southern New Hampshire University and Liberty University, which don't have the reputational baggage for-profit schools do.

That leaves for-profit colleges fighting for an even smaller sliver of a shrinking pie.

Piper Jaffray analyst Peter Appert says nonprofit institutions have been slow to make a meaningful shift online, but now that they have, students are paying attention and there is a "sea change" in the market.

Enrollment in the online arm of Southern New Hampshire University, which has a ground campus in Manchester, N.H., more than doubled from last October, now hitting 16,700. University of Maryland University College, meanwhile, saw enrollment in its online programs increase by 5% in the last year, to 97,001 students.

Not all for-profit colleges are struggling. Some specialized and niche schools are still posting gains. Grand Canyon Education Inc., a Christian school with a traditional campus in Arizona and online operations, has seen enrollment soar by 60% since 2009, hitting 44,435 as of June 30. And American Public Education Inc.,  which targets people in the military and public safety, increased course registrations by 45% to 92,900 in that time. Michigan child abuse defense attorney programs are holding steady.

But another dark cloud looms: The Education Department says it is considering its legal and regulatory options in the wake of the July court decision striking down parts of the so-called "gainful employment" rule, which aimed to evaluate programs on how well they prepare students for employment, though industry insiders say it is unlikely much will happen in Washington until after the election.

Still, many institutions are under close watch. ITT Educational Services Inc. and Corinthian Colleges Inc. have both notified investors of a broad inquiry by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, while Universal Technical Institute Inc.and Bridgepoint Education Inc. have disclosed U.S. Department of Justice investigations into how schools incentivize staffers to land new students.

Robert Danford fits the profile of the typical for-profit customer. When the 24-year-old was looking for a program in graphic design this fall, he considered Career Education Corp.'s Collins College, where he had briefly studied a few years earlier. But he says the sales pitch and high cost—he says he took out $12,000 in loans for his first stint there—soured him on the school.

A Career Education spokesman says the school's admissions officers are trained on integrity and not to promise outcomes or access to financial aid when working with prospective students.

Mr. Danford enrolled instead in the nonprofit Chandler-Gilbert Community College in Chandler, Ariz., where he is paying a few hundred dollars per credit hour and takes courses part-time while working at a nearby Office Max. He says he intends to earn an associate degree and hopes to enroll in a bachelor's degree program down the line

Thursday, August 2, 2012

More B-Schools Choose Women as Deans

Story first reported from WSJ.com

Business school may still be a man's world, but institutions are looking to shake things up by placing female talent at the helm.

Eager to achieve—or at least approach—gender parity in their administrative ranks, many schools are "acting affirmatively" by picking women over similarly qualified men to fill deanship slots, says Lucy Apthorp Leske, a partner at search firm Witt/Kieffer. By doing so, schools hope to introduce more diverse opinions into their high-level decision-making. But whether these changes will make a difference long-term remains to be seen.

The dearth of women in deanships isn't unlike the current picture of women in chief executive roles—though, to be sure, it isn't quite as bleak.

Women constituted 18% of U.S. business-school deans in the 2011-2012 academic year, according to the Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business, an industry group. Meanwhile, women hold just 20 CEO spots at Fortune 500 companies, according to Catalyst, a nonprofit organization that supports women in business.

Lower down the ladder, women held nearly one-third of associate dean positions in the 2011-2012 academic year, compared with 20% a decade earlier. About one-fourth of deans used that position, overseeing curriculum or academic programs, as a launch pad to the top spot, according to a recent AACSB survey.

Schools are courting those up-and-comers aggressively. Alison Davis-Blake, dean of University of Michigan's Ross School of Business, began receiving inquiries from search firms while a senior associate dean at University of Texas, Austin's McCombs School of Business. She says she was contacted "to excess."

Some suggest that schools' eagerness to even out the ranks among deans is little more than a numbers play, since many women deans say that their gender has little impact on the way they actually lead their business schools on a day-to-day basis.

"In terms of strategic positioning and core tactical actions, I don't think those are really any different because of gender," says Ms. Davis-Blake. While some women faculty and administrators may be drawn to a particular school because there are other women at the top, she says it is likely just "on the margins."

Nevertheless, any top-tier dean—man or woman—holds sway in powerful business and policy circles. They often serve as directors of major companies, set the agenda for what tomorrow's corporate titans might learn and, in the wake of the financial crisis, are called upon to defend the very existence and value of their institutions.

Plus, having women in leadership positions can make a mark on a school's student body, a crucial asset as institutions look to close the gender gap among that population as well. (About one-third of M.B.A. students are women, according to estimates from Forté Foundation, a group that seeks to create gender parity in corporate leadership.)

The presence of women deans, just like the presence of women executives in the corporate world, "helps [students] to see the kind of things they can do and where they can go," says Linda Livingstone, dean of Pepperdine University's Graziadio School of Business and Management.

The intense demand for female deans has allowed prospects to be picky, wary of being added to shortlists just to serve as token representatives, says Kenneth Kring, co-managing director of the global education practice at Korn/Ferry International. (Korn/Ferry in recent years has helped place women deans at Ross, Northwestern University's Kellogg School of Management and University of Missouri's Robert J. Trulaske, Sr. College of Business.)

Some women turn down the position, fearing a blow to their work-life balance, since academic deanships can be just as demanding as a chief-executive role. Ms. Livingstone, who has a 16-year-old daughter, says the deanship put a "burden on [her] family as a whole" but she and her husband were "willing to align [their] lives to work that way."

Meanwhile, a handful of business schools, including those at Boston University and Wake Forest University, have turned to the corporate world—where women are even more of a rarity—to fill recent deanship openings. Both schools picked men.

Though Ohio State University's Fisher College of Business opted for a woman when it nabbed Johnson & Johnson executive Christine A. Poon for its dean in 2009, a broader shift toward tapping business executives in general could quash advancement opportunities for academic women already waiting in the wings. It may even hurt gender parity in academic leadership, since the pool of corporate candidates skews more heavily male.

For more national and worldwide Business News, visit the Peak News Room blog.
For more local and state of Michigan Business News, visit the Michigan Business News  blog.
For more Health News, visit the Healthcare and Medical News blog.
For more Electronics News, visit the Electronics America blog.
For more Real Estate News, visit the Commercial and Residential Real Estate blog.
For more Law News, visit the Nation of Law blog.
For more Advertising News, visit the Advertising, Marketing and Media blog.
For more Environmental News, visit the Environmental Responsibility News blog.
For information on website optimization or for the latest SEO News, visit the SEO Done Right blog.

Tuesday, February 7, 2012

Schools With High Price Tags

First appeared in USA Today
The latest list of America's "best value" colleges includes several with the highest sticker prices in the nation, according to a new ranking released Monday.

Among the schools with large tuitions that are nonetheless considered top-value colleges are Williams and Swarthmore, according to The Princeton Review's annual list of best value schools. The list is considered a guide for prospective college applicants to seek out the best value for their money.

"We're very quick to say it can't just be a low sticker price," Best Value Colleges lead author Robert Franek says. "The commitment has to be much deeper than that."

The key issue is whether institutions can keep costs down while raising the quality of their education, says John Roush, president of Centre College in Danville, Ky., one of 150 schools listed in the guide, released exclusively to USA TODAY.

Centre's comprehensive tuition is about $40,000 for a full-time undergraduate living on campus. That's slightly below the national average reported by the non-profit College Board this year for private colleges. With need-based grants averaging $24,000, many families pay far less.

In the national debate about college affordability, value has become a central theme. President Obama brought it up in a speech last month. It came up in a Senate hearing last week. And it's high on the agenda when higher education leaders gather.

This year's Best Value Colleges list, which features 75 public and 75 private colleges, was drawn from data from 650 colleges. Selections were based on academics, cost of attendance and gift aid. The online database includes financial details for each college, such as the average need-based aid awarded, the average amount borrowed and the percentage of students who borrow. A companion book released Monday, The Best Value Colleges 2012, includes more details, including four-year and six-year graduation rates.

Mary Sue Coleman, president of the University of Michigan, a Best Value public college, says her school spends more than $300 million in undergraduate financial aid so students can focus on their studies rather than their pocketbooks.