231-922-9460 | Google +

Showing posts with label Bing. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Bing. Show all posts

Tuesday, December 15, 2009

Bing Gaining . . . But Not On Google

LA Times

Bing, the nearly 6-month-old search engine from Microsoft Corp., has steadily been capturing more of the Web search market.  But instead of stealing users from market leader Google Inc., Bing is still siphoning them from ally Yahoo Inc.


Bing captured 10.3% of the search pie in November, according to the latest numbers released by ComScore Inc and reported today by the Associated Press.  That's up from 9.9% the month before.  But Yahoo's share decreased by about the same margin, dropping from 18.0% to 17.5% during the same period. 

Yahoo and Microsoft, which signed a deal in late July to allow Microsoft to operate the search engines for both companies, have not been able to boost their combined market share much past 28%, where it's been hovering at least since the debut of Bing.

Meanwhile, market leader Google has been slowly but surely gaining share, rising from 65% in June, when Bing launched, to 65.6% in November.

Saturday, October 3, 2009

Bing Losing Search Share

Story from Information Week

Searchers used Bing less in September than in previous months, ending three consecutive months of growth.

Microsoft (NSDQ: MSFT)'s Bing search engine lost market share for the first time since its launch in May and its Internet Explorer browser continued its long, slow slide.

A turnaround could be in the offing: Windows 7 launches on October 22, and Microsoft's considerable marketing muscle may generate some lift beyond the operating system market.

But in the calm before the ad blitz, Microsoft's search and browser power is suffering.

Bing lost 0.2 percentage points, dropping to a 3.39% share of the global search market, according to NetApplictions. Google lost a similar number of percentage points, dropping to 83.13% global search share. Yahoo (NSDQ: YHOO) lost 0.44 percentage points to end up at 6.84%.

A different metrics firm, StatCounter, said that Bing declined slightly on a global basis, from 3.58% to 3.25%, a drop mirrored by Yahoo, which fell from 4.84% to 4.37%.

Globally, StatCount saw Google (NSDQ: GOOG) gaining rather than slipping, as NetApplications did: Google's global search share increased to 90.54% in September, from 89.57% in August, according to StatCounter's yardstick.

StatCounter's figures also show Google US search share rising to 80.08% in September from 77.83% in August.

Bing's share of the US search market in September dropped to 8.51% from 9.64% in August, according to StatCounter. Yahoo's US search share during this period dropped from 10.5% to 9.4%.

With regard to Web browser usage, Internet Explorer went from 58.69% in August to 58.37% in September, as StatCounter reports. According to NetApplications, Internet Explorer's decline went from 66.97% to 65.71%.

Firefox reached a global market share of 23.75%, according to NetApplications, a level just below its 23.84% high-water mark in April. Google's Chrome browser and Apple's Safari browser also posted gains to end up at 3.17% and 4.24% respectively.

As StatCounter sees it, Chrome actually passed Safari in August and increased its lead in September. Chrome finished the month with global market share of 3.69% while Safari came in at 3.28%.

Friday, August 14, 2009

Icahn Finds Himself Target of Investor Ire

Story by The Wall Street Journal

For years, Carl Icahn has invested in companies and then publicly harangued their managers for not doing more to boost the value of their shares.

Now, Mr. Icahn finds himself the target of investor complaint. A hedge fund is alleging that Mr. Icahn -- as director and majority owner of XO Holdings Inc. -- hurt shareholders by snubbing three approaches to acquire the struggling telecommunications company that could have boosted the stock, according to a recently unsealed lawsuit.

Carl IcahnIn a suit filed in a New York state court, the hedge fund, R2 Investments LDC, which owns 8.8% of the Herndon, Va., company, says at least one of the bids was above the company's stock price at the time. Instead of pursuing them, Mr. Icahn opted to refinance XO's debt by purchasing $780 million of preferred stock.

That paid off for Mr. Icahn, R2 alleges in the suit, because he could use the preferred stock to boost his stake in XO above 80%, enabling him to tap the company's previous losses for valuable offsets to taxes at his other businesses.

Meanwhile, XO's stock fell from around $1.27 a share at the time the first bid was made to just 28 cents last month, when Mr. Icahn lodged a bid to buy the whole company.

XO has moved to dismiss the complaint. Chief Executive Carl Grivner said it would have been "a waste of time" to pursue the bids for XO or its assets, because telecom bidders at the time "couldn't get financing." Stocks of comparable telecoms companies have suffered worse declines than XO's, he said.

In court papers, Mr. Icahn said XO directors had no obligation to pursue the bids under the legal doctrine of "business judgment," which gives boards discretion to pursue actions they think are in a company's best interest.

Securities lawyers say corporate executives don't have an absolute requirement to accept or disclose financial offers. But the position isn't one usually associated with Mr. Icahn, who has spent a lot of time urging executives at companies like Kerr-McGee Corp., Blockbuster Inc., and Time Warner Inc., to sell assets or step down to boost the value of shares.

Mr. Icahn "spends so much time advocating shareholder rights" at higher profile companies, but has taken steps to "harm shareholders" at XO, said Geoffrey Raynor, managing member of Q Investments LP, a $1.5 billion Fort Worth, Texas, family of hedge funds that includes XO plaintiff R2.

Mr. Icahn called the statement "ludicrous." In an interview, he said his $780 million preferred investment saved the company from the risk of insolvency at a time when "money was not available."

Yahoo, Google, Bing NumbersMr. Icahn gained control of XO, a casualty of the popped technology bubble, after it sought bankruptcy protection in 2002. When XO emerged from bankruptcy proceedings in 2003, Mr. Icahn owned 83% of its stock and 85% of its bank debt. His stake fell below 80% when the company sold shares in a rights offering, and he now owns 53%.
[Icahn Chart]

R2 successfully sued to block an effort by Mr. Icahn to buy XO's profitable wireline assets in late 2005, a deal it argued would have left the company only an unprofitable wireless business.

The fund was granted the right to discovery of XO's records last November by a judge who said, referring to the 2008 preferred-stock issue, that there was "a sufficient credible basis... there might have been wrongdoing or conduct that led to an unfair transaction."

The suit by R2 didn't identify the bidders it says Mr. Icahn snubbed. But people familiar with the matter say separate acquisition bids in the range of $1 billion for all or part of XO were submitted in March and June of 2008 by Paetec Holding Corp. and Zayo Group. A third bidder that couldn't be identified showed interest in an acquisition. The bids went nowhere, the suit says.

Paetec, a publicly traded Fairport, N.Y., communications-services company, and Zayo, a closely held Louisville, Colo., fiber-network service company, declined to comment.

Morgan Stanley, which had been retained by XO to explore financing alternatives, said in April 2008 that a $1 billion bid would be worth $2.25 a share, when XO's stock was trading at $1.27, the suit said. The bank recommended that the bids be explored so that XO directors could weigh their value against the financing alternatives, according to the suit and people familiar with the bidding.

XO's shares, which traded above $5 a share in 2007, fell from $1.70 in March 2008 to a low of 12 cents a share in late 2008. Last month Mr. Icahn offered to buy out XO's other shareholders for 55 cents a share.

Wednesday, July 29, 2009

Finally Microsoft And Yahoo Search Join Forces

Story by CNN Money

After a year and a half of dealing, the tech giants reach a deal to take on Google, which holds a 65% market share in online search.

NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- Microsoft and Yahoo reached a long-awaited partnership Wednesday in a bid to challenge Google's dominance in online search.

Under the 10-year deal, searches on Yahoo.com will be powered by Microsoft's new Bing search engine. Yahoo, in turn, will be responsible for attracting premium advertisers.

Microsoft will pay Yahoo 88% of the revenue it gains from searches on Yahoo's sites. Microsoft will also have the rights to integrate Yahoo search technology into its own existing Web search platforms.

Yahoo said the revenue sharing agreement will increase its operating income by about $500 million annually.

According to Microsoft Chief Executive Steve Ballmer, the deal will allow Microsoft to "create more innovation in search, better value for advertisers and real consumer choice in a market currently dominated by a single company."

And in a dig against search market leader Google (GOOG, Fortune 500), the companies said in a joint statement that "advertisers no longer have to rely on one company that dominates more than 70% of all search."

An 18-month odyssey. It was a partnership that was a long time in the making. Microsoft's (MSFT, Fortune 500) search market share has been slipping for more than two years, and the company has struggled to make its online advertising unit profitable. Meanwhile, Yahoo (YHOO, Fortune 500), once the search market leader, dropped to a distant second place behind leader Google (GOOG, Fortune 500) by 2007.
Google, Yahoo, Bing Search Volume
The dealings between the two companies began Feb. 1, 2008, when Microsoft made an unsolicited $44.6 billion cash and stock bid for Yahoo. A week later, Yahoo rejected the bid, saying the $31 per share offer "massively undervalues" the company, despite the fact that the bid represented a 62% premium over Yahoo's $19.18 closing stock price a day before the announcement.

In an attempt to fend off Microsoft, Yahoo launched a two-week trial partnership with rival Google on April 10, 2008. That involved outsourcing advertising space to Google as part of a short-term agreement that could eventually lead to a bigger partnership.

Microsoft threatened to take its bid to Yahoo's shareholders by the end of April if a deal could not be reached, and even sweetened the pot to $33 per share. In a turnaround move, Microsoft opted to avoid a hostile takeover and simply dropped the bid for Yahoo altogether on May 5 of last year. Microsoft CEO Ballmer cited the economics of the deal as well as Yahoo's interest in a long-term Google partnership as reasons.

Almost as soon as the deal seemingly died, signs of life re-emerged. First, activist investor Carl Icahn threatened Yahoo's board with a proxy battle if the company's executives didn't return to the bargaining table with Microsoft. Then, shares of Yahoo rocketed higher on May 19, 2008, when rumors circulated that Microsoft was interested in Yahoo's search advertisement business.

On June 12 of last year, however, Yahoo announced that discussions with Microsoft had ended without a pact. The same day, Yahoo turned around and announced a deal with Google to put Google ads on Yahoo's search pages. That tie-up was later nixed after a Justice Department antitrust investigation prompted Google to end the partnership. Icahn and Yahoo reached a truce in late July of last year.

The situation at Yahoo took a turn for the worse after the credit crisis erupted in October. Yahoo announced it would lay off 10% of its workforce in late October, shares slipped below $9 in November and Chief Executive Jerry Yang announced his resignation.

When Carol Bartz came on as Yahoo's new CEO in January 2009, she said she would not sell the company outright, but appeared to be more open to a sale of the company's search business.

Rumors of a possible deal were reignited when Bartz acknowledged at the All Things Digital conference on May 27 that Yahoo and Microsoft had been talking "a little bit," and said outright that Yahoo's search business was for sale, albeit for "boatloads" of money.

The next day, Ballmer unveiled Microsoft's new Bing search engine. Reports began to circulate in mid-June that Bing was a success, growing Microsoft's beaten-down search market share and eating into Yahoo's, and Ballmer reiterated to Fortune's Patricia Sellers that Microsoft "remains open to a partnership with Yahoo."

Tuesday, June 9, 2009

Google CEO Eric Schmidt Gives First Impression Of Bing
Video from Fortune Magazine

Monday, June 1, 2009

Microsoft Bing No Sure Thing
Story from the Wall Street Journal

Microsoft Corp. hasn't had much success competing head-on with Google Inc. in the Internet search market. Now it's staging a flank attack.

Its new Bing Internet search engine, which it showed publicly for the first time Thursday, will still provide search results for any term an online user types into it. But Bing is initially designed to provide a much richer search experience for people looking for information in four categories: shopping, travel, health and local businesses.

The strategy could give Microsoft a shot at peeling away users from rival search engines in some popular search areas that also offer lucrative opportunities for selling related advertising.

But even if Microsoft is successful, it still faces the problem that Google and Yahoo could simply duplicate Bing's features. Search engines have a long history of copying each other's interface changes.

In recent years, for example, all of them have begun suggesting related search terms and blending more photos and videos into their search results.

"If some particular feature becomes particularly popular, it wouldn't be terribly difficult for Google to mimic that feature," says Greg Sterling, an Internet analyst with Sterling Market Intelligence, a research firm.

Bing faces another challenge as well: Microsoft's own research shows that more than 60% of consumers say they are satisfied with existing Internet search engines. That doesn't bode well for the company's efforts to eat into Google's 64% share of the U.S. search market, which far outstrips Yahoo's 20% share and Microsoft's 8%, according to comScore Inc.

Still, there's evidence consumers aren't finding what they want very quickly through existing search engines, says Frederick Savoye, Microsoft's senior director of search.

Microsoft's research shows only one in four searches are satisfactory on the first try. Most others force users to repeatedly refine their queries or to click around on the Web before locating what they need.

Bing's travel-related searches illustrate how Microsoft will try to one-up its competitors.

The top results from a Bing search for the words "flights from Seattle to San Francisco" include a link that shows a low roundtrip fare of $117. The search page also offers an icon predicting, based on historical trends, what will happen to ticket prices over the next seven days.

The links, powered by a travel search engine called Farecast that Microsoft acquired last year, lead to a Bing Travel site from which users can link to airline sites to purchase tickets.

A search for the same terms on Google and Yahoo provides links to airline and booking-agency Web sites, but no ticket prices or predictions about how they will change.

Microsoft's approach of going after the four search categories mirrors attempts others have made to compete with Google by building so-called "vertical" search engines, which specialize in showing results in categories where Google's results are perceived to be weak.

In general, those properties have failed to gain much traction because most consumers prefer a one-stop shop. At the same time, Yahoo and Google have developed and deployed technology unique to specific search areas, like local businesses and shopping.

Google and Yahoo say they welcome the competition from Bing. "The search industry is still in its infancy and there are limitless opportunities for innovation and competition amongst companies including Microsoft," says Prabhakar Raghavan, head of Yahoo Labs and Yahoo Search Strategy.

"Having great competitors is a huge benefit to us and everyone in the search space," adds Google spokesman Nate Tyler. "It makes us all work harder, and at the end of the day our users benefit from that."

Saturday, May 30, 2009

Microsoft Banking On Former Yahoo! Wizard To Compete With Google
Story from Business Week

Qi Lu has had more than his fill of losing to Google. For a decade, the technologist led development of Yahoo!'s Internet search technology and watched Google eclipse his company to become the Internet's brightest star. He left Yahoo in August with vague plans to start a company or return to his native China. Then Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer came calling. He wanted Lu to consider taking over Microsoft's online operations and lead the charge against Google one more time. Ballmer promised the company was willing to invest vast resources to compete, even if it took years to pay off. "The more I thought about it, the more it seemed like a duty," says Lu, during an interview at the software giant's Redmond (Wash.) headquarters on a balmy May day. "There's a chance—a genuine chance—that we can make the search landscape a whole lot more competitive and healthy."

He may be one of the few people who believe that. But Microsoft is giving Lu more backup than he's ever had before. On May 28, the company was set to unveil an ambitious new search offering called Bing. Instead of just finding promising Web links, the site is designed to help consumers more easily make complex decisions—like what car to buy or where to go on vacation. The goal is to create a loyal base of fans who routinely use Bing for certain types of queries, rather than default to Google. To support the launch, Microsoft is gearing up its biggest search marketing blitz ever, one that could run as much as $100 million. "We're going [to show] consumers that the two guys that really care about helping you navigate the Internet are us and Google," says Ballmer "This will be the first time we will step out and say, 'We're not just sort of a general online player. We're really a player in search.' "

The stakes are high. Microsoft was slow to recognize the importance of search, only starting to build its own technology in 2003. Since then, the effort has contributed to barrels of red ink in the company's Internet business, including more than $3.5 billion in losses in the past three years. Yet Microsoft has only lost ground with its Live Search, dropping to just 8% of U.S. searches, while Google has grown to 64%. Microsoft has missed out on billions in potential revenues that might have goosed its stock, which is stuck at the same level it hit in 1998. Worse, Google is using its dominance in search to attack Microsoft's most lucrative businesses—including its Windows operating system and Office suite of business software.

Most search experts believe Lu (whose name is pronounced CHEE-loo) will struggle to do much better against Google this time. The search kingpin is refining its own technology all the time, and the data it gathers from handling almost two-thirds of people's queries give it deep insight into how they react to various search alternatives. "Microsoft is making some nice changes, but [there are] no game changers," says Danny Sullivan, editor in chief of the blog Search Engine Land who has been briefed on Microsoft's new site. "I still don't think Microsoft fully realizes how far behind Google they are."

Lu and other Microsoft executives argue they have an opening few experts see. The company's extensive research has turned up a surprising vulnerability at Google: While Web surfers may say they're happy with search technology, the data show they don't find what they're after almost half the time. Microsoft has designed the new search offering to remove the roadblocks. One example: Microsoft researchers found that 25% of clicks on search pages involve going back to the previous page, suggesting a frustrated search. So Microsoft developed a feature to avoid the wasted effort: When users hover over a Web link without clicking, Microsoft's computers generate a pop-up summary of the link.

Lu and his team have also designed a pane on the left third of the search page that generates a "table of contents" for each search. Entering "U2" brings up categories such as "songs," "tickets," and "biography," while a search for "Honda Accord" offers to lead you to "used," "reviews," and "specs." "For anything beyond finding a Web site—say, finding a person, buying a product, finding a relationship—today's search experience is not compelling," says Lu.

The marketing blitz will hit a similar note. In one TV spot, Microsoft will poke fun at Google by comparing its search to a bad relationship where your significant other takes too long to respond to questions and then gives the wrong answers three out of four times. Microsoft has also spent hundreds of millions on distribution deals that will make Bing the default search engine on Hewlett-Packard (HPQ) and Dell (DELL) PCs and Verizon phones.

LOVING THE 19-HOUR DAY

Google is certainly paying attention. The company has been adding a number of new features to its own search engine in recent months. And at a press event on May 12, Google unveiled an option to open a new left-pane feature that resembles Microsoft's technology. Marissa Mayer, vice-president for search products and user experience, declined to comment on Microsoft specifically, but says, "Search is really in its infancy. We're just really getting started."

Lu, 47, has been as involved as anyone in the technology's history. After a brief stint at IBM, he helped meld three Yahoo acquisitions to launch its first search offering in the late 1990s and later oversaw development of the technology that lets Yahoo make money by placing ads alongside search results. Along the way, he earned a reputation for having both technical chops and relentless work habits. He wakes at 3:00 a.m. most days, takes a five-mile run, and often works until 10:00 p.m. "It doesn't feel long because I love every day," says Lu, who is married with two children.

These qualities made him something of an institution at Yahoo, where he constantly pressed for management to pour more dollars into building the technology infrastructure necessary to keep pace in search. In the end, sources say he lost faith in the company's ability to do so, and left. Former Yahoo engineer Amit Kumar says Lu was "universally well liked" and at his going-away party T-shirts were handed out that read: "I worked with Qi. Did you?"

A FATEFUL ENCOUNTER

Lu has faced tough challenges since he was a boy. Facing persecution during China's Cultural Revolution, his parents sent him from their Shanghai home to live with his grandfather in a tiny town in Jiangsu province, five hours away. Lu lived without electricity or plumbing, and was so poor that meat was a once-a-year luxury. His first two choices to escape poverty were closed off: His slight build left him short of government weight mandates for coveted ship-building jobs, and his eyesight was too poor to pass requirements for becoming a physicist.

That left computer science, which he hoped might help him land a job in a radio factory. Instead, after earning his master's degree, he was assigned to a $10 a month teaching job at Fudan University in Shanghai. One weekend a rainstorm prevented his weekly bike ride home to see his parents, so he was in his dorm room when a student knocked and pleaded with him to attend a talk by Carnegie Mellon professor Edmund M. Clark since only a few students had showed up. Impressed with Lu's questions, Clark asked to see his research papers and then offered him a scholarship to earn his PhD—even waiving the $45 application fee that Lu says he could never have come up with.

Even fans question whether he has the business acumen to be Microsoft's savior. One former Yahoo executive thinks Lu's main allure to Microsoft is that he'd be the perfect person to integrate Yahoo's search operation if Ballmer ever manages to gain control of the business, which Microsoft bid for last year. Ballmer disputes this. "Qi is here because he's absolutely the best guy on the planet to run a search business."

When Lu arrived in December as president of Microsoft's Online Services Division, he inherited a division that began planning its search offensive in mid-2007. That's when Ballmer asked Susan Athey, a young Harvard economist who studies auctions, to help rethink the search effort. In an initial session in Redmond, Athey quelled fears that there may not be room for a second player in the business, but only if Microsoft got much larger and learned to innovate much faster. Just buying Yahoo, as Ballmer was trying to do, wouldn't be enough. Later hired as Microsoft's chief economist, Athey led the research effort that uncovered consumers' frequent troubles with search. "There's no reason Microsoft couldn't catch Google," she says.

Since acccepting, Lu's priorities are to set long-term strategy while tightening up operations. One of his mantras: "Have your head above the clouds but your feet on the ground." He arrives at meetings with stacks of documents, many with notes jotted down in the margins, and requires that a summary be written up afterwards. He is also pushing through changes so that the search group can forecast revenues on a daily rather than monthly basis, to react more quickly to what's working.

Still, he thinks Microsoft's real strength is its willingness to lay out a multi-year plan to gain on Google. Lu's group is working more closely with Microsoft Research so new technologies can be integrated into search. Soon, people with mobile phones will be able to speak search terms, rather than type them. Eventually, Lu says those looking for answers will be able to push beyond the limits of typing a few words in a rectangular box. "This is just the first step in a long journey," he says.