231-922-9460 | Google +

Showing posts with label Oracle Corp.. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Oracle Corp.. Show all posts

Thursday, August 9, 2012

Salesforce Attracts Big Rivals as Strategy Delivers

Even before Salesforce.com Inc. (CRM) went public in 2004, Chief Executive Officer Marc Benioff wasted few opportunities to poke fun at bigger, more established software companies, calling their products “landfill.”

In his management book “Behind the Cloud,” Benioff advised upstarts to “box above your weight.”

Now, Oracle Corp. (ORCL), SAP AG (SAP) and Microsoft Corp. (MSFT) are punching back, buying companies that offer business-management tools over the Internet, gaining traction in an area pioneered by Salesforce.

That’s stepping up pressure on Benioff to move beyonrd his core -- programs that manage sales -- and accelerate a push into software-development and social-media marketing, part of a bigger market valued by UBS AG at more than $100 billion.

Salesforce is facing pressure to expand into new markets.

When he started Salesforce, Benioff bet that wider use of the Internet would help enterprises stop buying servers and software and installing them in-house. The bet paid off, as companies look to use online services -- now called cloud computing -- to cut costs and streamline operations.

Salesforce now faces greater competition as Microsoft, Oracle and SAP have all made recent moves to become more broadly competitive against Salesforce.

For Rent

Concern over accelerating competition has diminished Salesforce’s value. The company’s enterprise value -- which accounts for its debt and market capitalization -- will fall to 5.85 times sales in the current fiscal year, versus its yearly average of 7.72 since 2005, data compiled by Bloomberg show. On the same basis, Oracle’s value has held up better amid an acquisition spree, with a ratio of 3.56 for its current year, compared with an average of 4.64.

Salesforce’s revenue growth may taper this year and next, from the 37 percent rate in the fiscal year that ended Jan. 31. The rally that lifted Salesforce’s stock 64 percent through April 19 from a low on Jan. 4 has since fizzled. The shares have declined 15 percent since that peak.

Benioff for years has beaten the drum for corporate software delivered as an online service as a more efficient way for companies to run sales, marketing and customer support. Instead of paying multimillion-dollar licensing fees up front, SAAS allows customers to rent applications by the month via a Web browser, with Salesforce handling updates.

Tough Rivals

Recently Oracle, SAP and Microsoft have all made moves that validate what Salesforce.com has been delivering to companies over the past decade.

Benioff, who recently joined the board of Cisco Systems Inc. (CSCO), spent 13 years at Oracle before starting Salesforce in 1999 with the blessing of Oracle CEO Larry Ellison, who also invested $2 million in the venture.
A decade later, Ellison, speaking at a posh Silicon Valley hotel three summers ago, lambasted Salesforce, accusing the software maker of repackaging decades-old technology. Cloud computing, Ellison ranted, was “nonsense.”

“All it is, is a computer attached to a network.” Of Salesforce, Ellison added, “They change a term and they think they’ve invented technology.”

These days, Ellison has embraced cloud computing, buying companies and starting his own online computing service to deliver Oracle’s business applications and database software.

Gathering Clouds

Oracle, based in Redwood City, California, says it’s already booked $1 billion from cloud computing, as well as online human resources and customer support companies it acquired in the past year. Customers include Yahoo! Inc. (YHOO), Starbucks Corp. (SBUX) and Hyatt Hotels Corp. (H)

Beyond the $13 billion customer relationship management software segment, UBS analyst Brent Thill estimates the broader platform software market, which includes databases and development tools, to be worth $101 billion.
“We’re the second biggest software-as-a-service provider today and to be honest with you, we just got started,” Oracle co-President Mark Hurd said in a recent interview.

Oracle also plans to add accounting, supply chain management, and manufacturing planning to its online offerings.

Dream Deals

SAP, the world’s largest maker of business management applications, reported better-than-estimated earnings thanks to its SuccessFactors online HR software. Redmond, Washington-based Microsoft, a perennial Benioff target, last month bought Yammer Inc., a Facebook-like corporate networking tool that competes with Salesforce’s Chatter.

To contend with the newfound competition, Salesforce is expanding into human resources and tools for marketing on Facebook and Twitter. At its annual Dreamforce conference on Sept. 18 in San Francisco, where Salesforce is based, the company plans to detail its new human resources offering. Benioff will unveil Work.com, which will let managers set organizational goals and recognize employees.

One of Salesforce's  customers DuPont has been acquiring companies through structured M&As and making a lot of acquisitions that give them new capabilities.  said DuPont Co. DuPont has standardized on three vendors -- SAP, Salesforce and Microsoft -- and expects each to deliver technology it can rent on a monthly basis.

Star Hire

Salesforce can hit $10 billion in sales given its pace of growth, though no target dates have been set. Analysts expect Salesforce to reach $10.8 billion in annual sales by 2020, according to estimates.

Salesforce has begun to lean on the expertise of a Silicon Valley engineering executive who joined Salesforce last year after spending 12 years at Oracle and almost three at SAP.

The challenge at Salesforce is that the company grew out of selling primarily to small and medium-sized businesses, not necessarily large enterprises.

The newest senior developer at Salesforce are determined to establish credibility after presiding over the years-late Fusion suite at Oracle, then departing SAP after less than three years.

Social Element

Salesforce and Oracle are also dueling to take advantage of growing corporate demand for marketers to create campaigns and garner product feedback from Facebook and Twitter users’ streams of posts.

Oracle bought closely held Involver Inc. following deals for Vitrue Inc. and Collective Intellect Inc. in the past three months. Google Inc. (GOOG) recently said it would buy Wildfire Interactive Inc. for about $250 million to let ad clients design social media marketing campaigns.

The acquisitions echo Salesforce’s $745 million latest deal for social marketing company Buddy Media Inc.

Oracle and Salesforce are buying social media ad delivery companies because they see a lot of activity, and the growth rates are very high.

For more national and worldwide Business News, visit the Peak News Room blog.
For more local and state of Michigan Business News, visit the Michigan Business News  blog.
For more Health News, visit the Healthcare and Medical News blog.
For more Electronics News, visit the Electronics America blog.
For more Real Estate News, visit the Commercial and Residential Real Estate blog.
For more Law News, visit the Nation of Law blog.
For more Advertising News, visit the Advertising, Marketing and Media blog.
For more Environmental News, visit the Environmental Responsibility News blog.

Thursday, April 19, 2012

Google CEO Smug in Courtroom

Story first appeared on Manufacturing.net

The Google CEO spent nearly an hour in a federal courtroom Wednesday deflecting questions about his role in a copyright dispute over some of the technology in his company's Android software for smartphones.

The taciturn man often looked uncomfortable on the witness stand as he sparred with tenacious copyright lawyer who made headlines for grilling former Microsoft Corp. CEO in an antitrust lawsuit filed by the U.S. government in 1990s.

In this trial, the lawyer is working for business software maker Oracle Corp., which accused Google Inc. of building its Android software by stealing pieces of the technology from Java, a programming platform that Oracle now owns.

Oracle, which is based in Redwood Shores, California, is seeking hundreds of millions in damages and royalties for Google's future use of Android, which powers more than 300 million smartphones and tablet computers.

In a measure of the trial's high stakes, Oracle has already called two multibillionaire executives to the witness stand. Oracle's own CEO,  appeared Tuesday, as did Google's for a brief round of questioning before his Wednesday return for more extensive interrogations. In both appearances, Google's CEO sported a suit and tie, a departure from the casual attire he wears around Google's Mountain View, California headquarters.

He looked like he wished he could have stayed in Mountain View Wednesday. During his time on the stand, he rarely looked at the lawyer and frequently said he couldn't remember seeing some of the internal Google documents that Oracle is using to build its case.

The Google CEO's foggy memory seemed to exasperate the lawyer, perhaps because the haze may have worked to Google's advantage.

The lawyer's attempts to display exhibits containing inside information about Google were blocked by the U.S. District Judge because Google's CEO couldn't recall seeing them. Although it's unclear what was in the exhibits, it was clear Google's own lawyers didn't want the contents to be exposed in a public courtroom.

Some of the evidence currently being kept under court seal is believed to include disclosures about how much money Google has made from Android since the software hit the market in 2008 -- a financial nugget that Google has never revealed.

Although Google gives away the software to mobile device makers, Android brings in revenue from digital advertising and sales of mobile applications that run on the system.

The lawyer spent much of his interrogation trying to prove the CEO and other Google executives realized that the company probably would have to pay a licensing fee to use elements of Java as far back as 2005. That's when the CEO orchestrated the deal to buy the Silicon Valley startup that hatched Android and brought in the Android founder to oversee an effort to make Google's online search engine, advertising and other services more accessible on mobile phones.

When shown emails from the Android founder and others mentioning the need to license some of Java during 2005 and 2006, the Google CEO linked the references to Google's attempts to build Android in a partnership with Sun Microsystems Inc., Java's owner at that time. Oracle entered the picture in 2010 when it bought Sun Microsystems for $7.3 billion.

He later elaborated on Google's discussions with Sun while he was under more cordial questioning from one of his company's lawyers.

Oracle's case hinges on whether Android infringes on 37 copyrights for "application programming interfaces," or APIs, that provide the blueprints for making much of Java work effectively. Other major companies, including IBM Corp, have licensed some of Java's APIs, but Google hasn't -- one of the few things that the lawyer was able to get the Google CEO to confirm during his testimony Wednesday.

Google contends the Java APIs aren't covered under U.S. copyright law because they aren't a form of creative expression.

But various Google emails presented in the trial so far have included internal recommendations to work out a license for some elements of Java. One August 2010 email from a Google engineer to the Android founder mentions being asked by the CEO and Google's other co-founder to review possible alternatives to Java.

When the lawyer asked about an email in Wednesday, the Google CEO wouldn't acknowledge telling anyone to look into the issue, let along knowing him.

In an apparent attempt to cast Google's stance on Java as hypocritical, the lawyer asked the CEO if his company copyrighted the APIs that run its services. He responded by saying that he thought things were just copyrighted by default.

The lawyer then asked him if Google might use copyrights to prevent an outsider from improperly using its technology. He responded by saying that Google is a company based on intellectual property, and that's one of the major intellectual property protections.

The Google CEO left the courtroom smiling, but still didn't look completely relaxed. Maybe that's because the judge told him that Oracle would probably call him back to testify before the trial is over.


For more national and worldwide related business news, visit the Peak News Room blog.
For local and Michigan business related news, visit the Michigan Business News blog.
For healthcare and medical related news, visit the Healthcare and Medical blog.
For law related news, visit the Nation of Law blog.
For real estate and home related news, visit the  Commercial and Residential Real Estate blog.
For technology and electronics related news, visit the Electronics America blog.
For organic SEO and web optimization related news, visit the SEO Done Right blog.

Wednesday, April 4, 2012

Aging Whistleblower Lawsuit Resurfaces


Story first appeared in the Chicago Tribune.

NEW YORK (Reuters) - An Oracle Corp. investor sued the company and members of its board of directors on Thursday for allegedly trying to "stonewall" a previously filed whistleblower lawsuit that ultimately resulted in a $200 million settlement.  A Minneapolis Whistleblower Lawyer has been following the case for some time.

The lawsuit filed by an investor in Delaware state court said the defendants, including the Oracle CEO and other past and present members of the company's board of directors, breached their duty to shareholders by engaging in prolonged litigation over the whistleblower's allegations, which the defendants allegedly knew to be true.

The settlement in question was the result of a whistleblower lawsuit filed in 2007 by Oracle's former senior director of contract services, who accused the company of violating price-reduction clauses in federal contracts covering $775 million in goods, extending discounts to commercial clients without doing the same for government buyers.

The 
U.S. Department of Justice intervened in the lawsuit in 2010. In 2011, Oracle paid more than $200 million to settle the lawsuit, including interest and payments for the whistleblower, the largest of its kind under the federal False Claims Act.

The investor is seeking an unspecified amount in damages on behalf of shareholders. A spokesman for Oracle did not immediately return a request for comment Thursday.